{"id":51788,"date":"2021-08-26T15:23:52","date_gmt":"2021-08-26T15:23:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/2021\/08\/26\/defecto-factico-por-la-omision-en-el-decreto-y-practica-de-pruebas\/"},"modified":"2021-08-26T15:23:52","modified_gmt":"2021-08-26T15:23:52","slug":"defecto-factico-por-la-omision-en-el-decreto-y-practica-de-pruebas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/2021\/08\/26\/defecto-factico-por-la-omision-en-el-decreto-y-practica-de-pruebas\/","title":{"rendered":"DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial\"> <font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y  PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS.\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2007\/T-458-07.html\">T-458\/07<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2010\/T-313-10.html\">T-313\/10<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2010\/T-395-10.html\">T-395\/10<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2011\/T-327-11.html\">T-327\/11<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2013\/T-267-13.html\">T-267\/13<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2013\/T-620-13.html\">T-620\/13<\/a>\u00a0&#8211;  T-937\/13.<\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial\"> <font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y  PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS-Alcance\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2009\/T-747-09.html\">T-747\/09<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2012\/T-996-12.html\">T-996\/12<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial\"> <font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y  PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS-L\u00ednea jurisprudencial\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2008\/T-1100-08.html\">T-1100\/08<\/a><\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS.\u00a0\u00a0T-458\/07,\u00a0T-313\/10,\u00a0T-395\/10,\u00a0T-327\/11,\u00a0T-267\/13,\u00a0T-620\/13\u00a0&#8211; T-937\/13. DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS-Alcance\u00a0\u00a0T-747\/09,\u00a0T-996\/12 DEFECTO FACTICO POR LA OMISION EN EL DECRETO Y PRACTICA DE PRUEBAS-L\u00ednea jurisprudencial\u00a0\u00a0T-1100\/08<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-d"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}