{"id":68929,"date":"2021-10-22T19:23:17","date_gmt":"2021-10-22T19:23:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/2021\/10\/22\/principio-indubio-pro-operario\/"},"modified":"2025-08-01T14:46:45","modified_gmt":"2025-08-01T19:46:45","slug":"principio-indubio-pro-operario","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/2021\/10\/22\/principio-indubio-pro-operario\/","title":{"rendered":"PRINCIPIO INDUBIO PRO OPERARIO"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>PRINCIPIO IN DUBIO PRO OPERARIO<\/strong>\u00a0&#8211; Criterio interpretativo de rango constitucional &#8211;\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2024\/INDICE_TEMATICO\/SU221-24.htm\">SU221-24<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<p>  PRINCIPIO INDUBIO PRO OPERARIO-Duda no existe como requisito sine qua non para  su aplicaci\u00f3n cuando norma art. 21 del Decreto 758 de 1990 ha perdido vigencia  en el ordenamiento jur\u00eddico &#8211;\u00a0<a style=\"font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2019\/SU140-19.html\">SU140-19<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PRINCIPIO IN DUBIO PRO OPERARIO\u00a0&#8211; Criterio interpretativo de rango constitucional &#8211;\u00a0SU221-24 PRINCIPIO INDUBIO PRO OPERARIO-Duda no existe como requisito sine qua non para su aplicaci\u00f3n cuando norma art. 21 del Decreto 758 de 1990 ha perdido vigencia en el ordenamiento jur\u00eddico &#8211;\u00a0SU140-19<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68929","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-p"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68929","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68929"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68929\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83807,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68929\/revisions\/83807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68929"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68929"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68929"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}