{"id":74434,"date":"2021-10-27T14:27:47","date_gmt":"2021-10-27T14:27:47","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2021-10-27T14:27:47","modified_gmt":"2021-10-27T14:27:47","slug":"recurso-de-suplica-contra-auto-que-rechaza-demanda-a-ley-estatutaria-de-administracion-de-justicia-sobre-conciliacion-judicial-y-extrajudicial-en-materia-contencioso-administrativa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/2021\/10\/27\/recurso-de-suplica-contra-auto-que-rechaza-demanda-a-ley-estatutaria-de-administracion-de-justicia-sobre-conciliacion-judicial-y-extrajudicial-en-materia-contencioso-administrativa\/","title":{"rendered":"RECURSO DE SUPLICA CONTRA AUTO QUE RECHAZA DEMANDA A LEY ESTATUTARIA DE ADMINISTRACION DE JUSTICIA SOBRE CONCILIACION JUDICIAL Y EXTRAJUDICIAL EN MATERIA CONTENCIOSO ADMINISTRATIVA"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>  RECURSO DE SUPLICA CONTRA AUTO QUE RECHAZA DEMANDA A LEY ESTATUTARIA DE  ADMINISTRACION DE JUSTICIA SOBRE CONCILIACION JUDICIAL Y EXTRAJUDICIAL EN  MATERIA CONTENCIOSO ADMINISTRATIVA-Confirma por existir cosa juzgada  constitucional en sentencia C-713\/08\u00a0<a style=\"font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 13.3333px; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/CORTE_CONSTITUCIONAL\/docs\/2010\/A235-10.html\">A.  235\/10<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RECURSO DE SUPLICA CONTRA AUTO QUE RECHAZA DEMANDA A LEY ESTATUTARIA DE ADMINISTRACION DE JUSTICIA SOBRE CONCILIACION JUDICIAL Y EXTRAJUDICIAL EN MATERIA CONTENCIOSO ADMINISTRATIVA-Confirma por existir cosa juzgada constitucional en sentencia C-713\/08\u00a0A. 235\/10<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-r"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_corte\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}