{"id":185,"date":"2021-10-29T22:27:29","date_gmt":"2021-10-29T22:27:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/10\/29\/antinomia\/"},"modified":"2025-11-26T10:59:13","modified_gmt":"2025-11-26T15:59:13","slug":"antinomia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/10\/29\/antinomia\/","title":{"rendered":"ANTINOMIA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>ANTINOMIA &#8211; S094\/03<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"ANTINOMIA\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial\">ANTINOMIA<\/a>&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;<a style=\"color: rgb(5, 99, 193); text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2003\/S-094-2003%20[6909].html\">S094\/03<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; line-height: 24px;\">ANTINOMIA&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Entre los art\u00edculos 331 y 342 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, referente a la procedencia del recurso de reposici\u00f3n y de s\u00faplica contra auto que admite el recurso extraordinario de casaci\u00f3n en proceso de simulaci\u00f3n. Aplicaci\u00f3n de las directrices del art\u00edculo 5 de la Ley 57 de 1887. Reiteraci\u00f3n del Auto de 11 de noviembre de 2016 y 29 de marzo de 2017.&nbsp;<a style=\"color: rgb(5, 99, 193); text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2018\/AC530-2018%20(2010-00074-01).html\">AC530-2018<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; line-height: 24px;\">ANTINOMIA&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Frente a la procedencia del recurso de reposici\u00f3n y de s\u00faplica contra auto que declara prematuro el recurso de casaci\u00f3n. Prevalencia del art\u00edculo 342 frente al inciso 1\u00ba del 331 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso por su car\u00e1cter posterior y especial. Reiteraci\u00f3n del auto de 11 de noviembre de 2016.&nbsp;<a style=\"color: rgb(5, 99, 193); text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2018\/AC220-2018%20(2011-00395-01).html\">AC220-2018<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ANTINOMIA &#8211; S094\/03 ANTINOMIA&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;S094\/03 ANTINOMIA&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Entre los art\u00edculos 331 y 342 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, referente a la procedencia del recurso de reposici\u00f3n y de s\u00faplica contra auto que admite el recurso extraordinario de casaci\u00f3n en proceso de simulaci\u00f3n. Aplicaci\u00f3n de las directrices del art\u00edculo 5 de la Ley 57 de 1887. Reiteraci\u00f3n del Auto [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-a"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3833,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185\/revisions\/3833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}