{"id":2219,"date":"2021-11-10T15:15:41","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T15:15:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/incongruencia-ultra-petita\/"},"modified":"2021-11-10T15:15:41","modified_gmt":"2021-11-10T15:15:41","slug":"incongruencia-ultra-petita","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/incongruencia-ultra-petita\/","title":{"rendered":"INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; De<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; De condena por lucro cesante consolidado y futuro derivado de la p\u00e9rdida de utilidades a causa de la falta de ejecuci\u00f3n de un contrato de obra y la p\u00e9rdida de capacidad laboral del 40% por superar la suma solicitada en la demanda.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2016\/SC17723-2016%20(2006-00123-02).html\">SC17723\/16<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; Declaraci\u00f3n del hito inicial de la uni\u00f3n marital de hecho en fecha anterior a la se\u00f1alada en la demanda.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2016\/SC16493-2016%20(2007-00491-01).html\">SC16493\/16<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; Frente a las sumas asignadas por condena de perjuicio material y moral, al haberse solicitado en el libelo que se impusieran las que resulten demostradas en el proceso.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2016\/SC16690-2016%20(2000-00196-01).html\">SC16690\/16<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; No se configura cuando el Tribunal aumenta la&nbsp;condena impuesta por el a quo, producto de realizar una indexaci\u00f3n o correcci\u00f3n&nbsp;monetaria a la suma reconocida como perjuicios en proceso de responsabilidad&nbsp;extracontractual por incendio.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC6185-2014%20[2008-00263-01].html\">SC6185\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; Respecto a la pretensi\u00f3n de la demanda del reconocimiento de frutos civiles y naturales desde la presentaci\u00f3n de la demanda.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2007\/1100131030272000-00528-01%20[%20SC-116-2007]%20.html\">SC116\/07<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; Se reconoce aun cuando el recurrente pida la incongruencia extra petita.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2007\/1100131030272000-00528-01%20[%20SC-116-2007]%20.html\">SC116\/07<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; text-align: justify; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INCONGRUENCIA&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Asimetr\u00eda del fallo con las pretensiones formuladas, las excepciones y la plataforma f\u00e1ctica de la controversia, revel\u00e1ndose como inadecuada formulaci\u00f3n del recurso extraordinario. AC2436-2018<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; De &nbsp; INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA &#8211; De condena por lucro cesante consolidado y futuro derivado de la p\u00e9rdida de utilidades a causa de la falta de ejecuci\u00f3n de un contrato de obra y la p\u00e9rdida de capacidad laboral del 40% por superar la suma solicitada en la demanda.&nbsp;SC17723\/16 INCONGRUENCIA ULTRA PETITA [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2219\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}