{"id":2295,"date":"2021-11-10T15:15:44","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T15:15:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/interpretacion-judicial\/"},"modified":"2021-11-10T15:15:44","modified_gmt":"2021-11-10T15:15:44","slug":"interpretacion-judicial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/interpretacion-judicial\/","title":{"rendered":"INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL &#8211; Aplica<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\"><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL &#8211; Aplicaci\u00f3n del principio de convalidaci\u00f3n. Caracter\u00ecsticas.&nbsp;<\/font><a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2019\/SC-069-2019.doc\">SC-069-2019<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Car\u00e1cter particular y subjetivo.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2005\/SC-064-2005%20[0989].html\">SC064\/05<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Directrices.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2009\/1100102030002005-00251-01[25-06-2009].html\">00251\/09<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Ex\u00e9gesis del art\u00edculo 10 de la Ley 75 de 1968. Reiteraci\u00f3n jurisprudencial del ingrediente subjetivo al examinar la caducidad de los efectos patrimoniales por culpa de los opositores.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC5755-2014%20[1990-00659-01].html\">00659\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Hermen\u00e9utica del art\u00edculo 107 del Decreto 1260 de 1970 para determinar la validez y plenos efectos del matrimonio que s\u00f3lo fue registrado hasta despu\u00e9s del fallecimiento de uno de los c\u00f3nyuges. Naturaleza jur\u00eddica de las inscripciones en el registro civil.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC7019-2014%20[2002-00487-01].html\">SC7019\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Hermen\u00e9utica del inciso 2 del art\u00edculo 180 del C\u00f3digo Civil, para establecer que la norma refiere \u00fanica y exclusivamente al matrimonio de extranjeros que se domicilien en Colombia.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC7726-2014%20[2005-00075-01].html\">SC7726\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\"><font face=\"Verdana\" size=\"2\">INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL &#8211; Inaplicabilidad de prodigar un trato desigual a sujetos que hoy son reconocidos como iguales.&nbsp;<\/font><a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2019\/SC-069-2019.doc\">SC-069-2019<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Reiteraci\u00f3n de la sentencia de 19 de diciembre de 2012 expediente 2006-00164, para determinar que el uso de un s\u00f3tano para la operanc\u00eda de una estaci\u00f3n de servicio el\u00e9ctrico no encaja dentro del art\u00edculo 34 de la Ley 142 de 1994.&nbsp;<a style=\"transition: color 0.2s ease-in-out 0s; color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC9100-2014%20[2006-00146-01].html\">SC9100\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; color: rgb(57, 69, 75); font-family: Arial; text-align: justify; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px\">INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;Desacertada por el juez escogido para sustraerse del conocimiento, en el sentido de considerar que se trataba de transferir el dominio de un bien inmueble en otra ciudad, cuando en verdad la pretensi\u00f3n apuntaba al cumplimiento de contrato. AC2448-2018<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL &#8211; Aplica INTERPRETACION JUDICIAL &#8211; Aplicaci\u00f3n del principio de convalidaci\u00f3n. Caracter\u00ecsticas.&nbsp;SC-069-2019 INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Car\u00e1cter particular y subjetivo.&nbsp;SC064\/05 INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Directrices.&nbsp;00251\/09 INTERPRETACI\u00d3N JUDICIAL &#8211; Ex\u00e9gesis del art\u00edculo 10 de la Ley 75 de 1968. Reiteraci\u00f3n jurisprudencial del ingrediente subjetivo al examinar la caducidad de los efectos patrimoniales por culpa de los opositores.&nbsp;00659\/14 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2295\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}