{"id":2909,"date":"2021-11-10T16:35:58","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T16:35:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/principio-de-no-reformatio-in-pejus\/"},"modified":"2021-11-10T16:35:58","modified_gmt":"2021-11-10T16:35:58","slug":"principio-de-no-reformatio-in-pejus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/principio-de-no-reformatio-in-pejus\/","title":{"rendered":"PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PE<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS &#8211; El confirmarse la negaci\u00f3n de pretensiones con argumentos jur\u00eddicos distintos a los expuestos en la sentencia de primera instancia no constituye violaci\u00f3n a este postulado.&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2015\/SC12024-2015%20[2009-00387-01].html\">SC12024\/15<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS &#8211; La modificaci\u00f3n de la sentencia en el hito inicial de la uni\u00f3n marital de hecho y la adici\u00f3n para tener por probada la tacha por sospecha no trasgreden este principio atendiendo que ambas partes apelaron&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2015\/SC4499-2015%20[2008-00084-02].html\">SC4499\/15<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS &#8211; Prosperidad de la acci\u00f3n reivindicatoria sin pronunciamiento del interesado frente a la omisi\u00f3n de condena del juez de primer grado respecto de las restituciones mutuas.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2016\/SC10825-2016%20[2011-00213-01].html\">SC10825\/16<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PE PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS &#8211; El confirmarse la negaci\u00f3n de pretensiones con argumentos jur\u00eddicos distintos a los expuestos en la sentencia de primera instancia no constituye violaci\u00f3n a este postulado.&nbsp;SC12024\/15 PRINCIPIO DE NO REFORMATIO IN PEJUS &#8211; La modificaci\u00f3n de la sentencia en el hito inicial de [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}