{"id":3480,"date":"2021-11-10T17:24:34","date_gmt":"2021-11-10T17:24:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/tacha-de-falsedad\/"},"modified":"2021-11-10T17:24:34","modified_gmt":"2021-11-10T17:24:34","slug":"tacha-de-falsedad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/2021\/11\/10\/tacha-de-falsedad\/","title":{"rendered":"TACHA DE FALSEDAD"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Improcedenci<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"left\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Improcedencia de su estudio, cuando se formula con el prop\u00f3sito de desvirtuar la excepci\u00f3n de m\u00e9rito frente a la pretensi\u00f3n desestimatoria del reconocimiento de la sociedad patrimonial de la uni\u00f3n marital de hecho.&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2016\/SC16891-2016%20(2006-00112-01).html\">SC16891\/16<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"left\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Reconocimiento impl\u00edcito del contenido de grabaci\u00f3n de llamada telef\u00f3nica introducida al proceso como prueba documental, por no haberse tachado de falsa.&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2014\/SC4756-2014%20[2005-00685-01].html\">00685\/14<\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\" align=\"left\" style=\"font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; line-height: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-thickness: initial; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; margin-left: 0cm; margin-right: 0cm; margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.0001pt\">TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211;&nbsp;Traducci\u00f3n del laudo arbitral internacional&nbsp;&nbsp;<a style=\"color: blue; text-decoration: underline\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/JURISPRUDENCIA\/SALA_CIVIL\/docs\/2011\/1100102030002007-01956-00%20[27-07-2011].html\">01956\/11<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Improcedenci TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Improcedencia de su estudio, cuando se formula con el prop\u00f3sito de desvirtuar la excepci\u00f3n de m\u00e9rito frente a la pretensi\u00f3n desestimatoria del reconocimiento de la sociedad patrimonial de la uni\u00f3n marital de hecho.&nbsp;SC16891\/16 TACHA DE FALSEDAD &#8211; Reconocimiento impl\u00edcito del contenido de grabaci\u00f3n de llamada telef\u00f3nica [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3480"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3480\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/indice_tematico_scivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}