{"id":53320,"date":"2024-05-17T20:40:30","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T20:40:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/17\/ac238-2021-2020-02892-00\/"},"modified":"2024-05-17T20:40:30","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T20:40:30","slug":"ac238-2021-2020-02892-00","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/17\/ac238-2021-2020-02892-00\/","title":{"rendered":"AC 238 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AC238-2021 (2020-02892-00)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2020-02892-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AC238-2021 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2020-02892-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bogot\u00e1, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;D.C., ocho (8) de febrero de dos mil veintiuno (2021). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Dec\u00eddese &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sobre la admisi\u00f3n de la solicitud de exequatur presentada por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Yharuma Helena V\u00e9lez Betancourt, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;frente a la sentencia n.\u00ba AP51-V-2017-008827 proferida el 5 de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;octubre de 2017 por el Tribunal S\u00e9ptimo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Primera Instancia de Mediaci\u00f3n, Sustanciaci\u00f3n y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ejecuci\u00f3n de Protecci\u00f3n de Ni\u00f1os, Ni\u00f1as &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Adolescentes de la Circunscripci\u00f3n Judicial del \u00c1rea &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Metropolitana de Caracas y Nacional de Adopci\u00f3n Internacional &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(Rep\u00fablica Bolivariana de Venezuela), &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;corregida mediante prove\u00eddo de 20 de diciembre de esa &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;calenda, en el proceso de privaci\u00f3n de patria potestad &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;seguido contra Oswaldo Esteban Rodr\u00edguez Viscaino, respecto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de la hija com\u00fan menor VARV1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONSIDERACIONES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;El exequatur &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;es un procedimiento jurisdiccional que tiene por finalidad otorgar a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;una sentencia proferida en el exterior los mismos efectos que una &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;local2, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en virtud de los principios de colaboraci\u00f3n arm\u00f3nica &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;entre los estados y reciprocidad diplom\u00e1tica. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En este caso, la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;administraci\u00f3n de justicia deja de estar en manos de los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;jueces nacionales, para admitir que lo resuelto por falladores &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;for\u00e1neos tenga pleno valor en el pa\u00eds, a condici\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de que se cumplan las formalidades fijadas en la regulaci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En Colombia, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tales requerimientos est\u00e1n consagrados en el art\u00edculo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;606 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, uno de los cuales es que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la providencia extranjera \u00abse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;encuentre ejecutoriada de conformidad con la ley del pa\u00eds de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;origen\u00bb3, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;esto es, que tenga car\u00e1cter definitivo. Para su acreditaci\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el actor tiene la carga procesal de acercar las pruebas que den &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cuenta de esta situaci\u00f3n, so pena que la actuaci\u00f3n sea &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;repelida in limine. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Una revisi\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del expediente bajo an\u00e1lisis pone de presente que la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;solicitud de autorizaci\u00f3n para la sentencia de 5 de octubre &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de 2017, corregida el 20 de diciembre siguiente, dictada por el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Tribunal S\u00e9ptimo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Primera Instancia de Mediaci\u00f3n, Sustanciaci\u00f3n y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ejecuci\u00f3n de Protecci\u00f3n de Ni\u00f1os, Ni\u00f1as &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Adolescentes de la Circunscripci\u00f3n Judicial del \u00c1rea &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Metropolitana de Caracas y Nacional de Adopci\u00f3n Internacional &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(Venezuela), debe &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;rechazarse porque la misma no cumple con el requisito a que se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;refiere el numeral 3\u00b0 del art\u00edculo 606 del estatuto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procesal vigente. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;En &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;efecto, la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sentencia que homolog\u00f3 el acuerdo de custodia, representaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;unilateral de la patria potestad, autorizaci\u00f3n de viaje y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;derecho a cambio de residencia suscrito entre Yharuma &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Helena V\u00e9lez Betancourt y Oswaldo Esteban Rodr\u00edguez &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Viscaino, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;circunscribi\u00f3 su decisi\u00f3n a los asuntos propios de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;esta declaraci\u00f3n, sin &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;indicar nada sobre los recursos que son procedentes en contra de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;esta, o las condiciones para considerarla ejecutoriada. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Tampoco &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se observa anotaci\u00f3n proveniente de autoridad alguna, que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;brinde la certeza requerida en este aspecto. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>La &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ausencia de demostraci\u00f3n de que la decisi\u00f3n adoptada &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por la justicia de la Rep\u00fablica Bolivariana &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Venezuela &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se encuentra \u00abejecutoriada\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;constituye una desatenci\u00f3n a una carga procesal en cabeza de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la actora, cuya consecuencia, de acuerdo con el art\u00edculo 606 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, es el rechazo de la demanda. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Este defecto ya &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;hab\u00eda sido puesto de presente a la peticionaria por parte de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la Sala, mediante auto AC2561-2020, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pese a lo cual insiste en la formulaci\u00f3n del exequatur sin la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;observancia de los presupuestos establecidos para el efecto en el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ordenamiento adjetivo. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.2. Ahora bien, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en torno a la afirmaci\u00f3n de la interesada que conforme al &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;art\u00edculo 518 de la \u00abLey &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Org\u00e1nica para la Protecci\u00f3n de Ni\u00f1os, Ni\u00f1as &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Adolescentes\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;los convenios extraprocesales homologados por el juez competente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;relativos a \u00abresponsabilidad &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de crianza, obligaci\u00f3n de manutenci\u00f3n, r\u00e9gimen &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de convivencia familiar, liquidaci\u00f3n y participaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de la comunidad conyugal tienen efecto de sentencia firme &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ejecutoriada\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;es preciso se\u00f1alar que aun aceptando tal circunstancia, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;gracia de discusi\u00f3n, la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;firmeza de la providencia materia de exequatur es un aspecto que se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;vincula de forma directa con la normatividad del pa\u00eds &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;extranjero, por lo que su demostraci\u00f3n debe atender las &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;reglas sobre prueba del derecho extranjero en Colombia, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;particular, el art\u00edculo 177 del C\u00f3digo General del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Proceso, norma que prev\u00e9: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u2026La &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;copia total o parcial de la ley extranjera deber\u00e1 expedirse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por la autoridad competente del respectivo pa\u00eds, por el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;c\u00f3nsul de ese pa\u00eds en Colombia o solicitarse al c\u00f3nsul &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;colombiano en ese pa\u00eds. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Tambi\u00e9n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;podr\u00e1 adjuntarse dictamen pericial rendido por persona o &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;instituci\u00f3n experta en raz\u00f3n de su conocimiento o &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;experiencia en cuanto a la ley de un pa\u00eds o territorio fuera &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Colombia, con independencia de si est\u00e1 habilitado para &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;actuar como abogado all\u00ed. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cuando se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;trate de ley extranjera no escrita, podr\u00e1 probarse con el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;testimonio de dos o m\u00e1s abogados del pa\u00eds de origen o &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;mediante dictamen pericial en los t\u00e9rminos del inciso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;precedente\u2026 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Por consiguiente, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la promotora para acreditar la ejecutoria del fallo delanteramente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;deb\u00eda probar la normatividad escrita sobre el tema y, de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;existir, deb\u00eda acudir previamente a la autoridad consular &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;para el tr\u00e1mite respectivo o anexar un dictamen pericial con &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;los requisitos del art\u00edculo 226 \u00eddem. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3. Por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;consiguiente, ante la inobservancia del presupuesto establecido en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el numeral 3 del art\u00edculo 606 ibidem, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en aplicaci\u00f3n del numeral 2 del art\u00edculo 607 ejusdem, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;deber\u00e1 rechazarse la demanda. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>DECISI\u00d3N &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En m\u00e9rito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de lo expuesto, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, resuelve: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Primero. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Rechazar de plano la solicitud de exequatur presentada por Yharuma &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Helena V\u00e9lez Betancourt, respecto a la sentencia n.\u00ba &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AP51-V-2017-008827 proferida el 5 de octubre de 2017 por el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Tribunal S\u00e9ptimo de Primera Instancia de Mediaci\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Sustanciaci\u00f3n y Ejecuci\u00f3n de Protecci\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ni\u00f1os, Ni\u00f1as y Adolescentes de la Circunscripci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Judicial del \u00c1rea Metropolitana de Caracas y Nacional de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Adopci\u00f3n Internacional (Rep\u00fablica Bolivariana de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Venezuela), corregida por la misma &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;autoridad mediante prove\u00eddo de 20 de diciembre de esa &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;calenda. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Segundo. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Secretar\u00eda, devu\u00e9lvase los anexos de la demanda sin &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;necesidad de desglose. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Tercero. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;No se reconoce a la abogada M\u00f3nica Patricia Tamayo Toro, dado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que el memorial de apoderamiento que obra en el archivo digital \u00ab2. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;poder\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;fue procurado para iniciar el tr\u00e1mite de homologaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;respecto de la sentencia de \u00ab20 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de diciembre de 2017\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y no de la proferida el 5 de octubre de 2017, corregida mediante &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;providencia de 20 de diciembre del mismo a\u00f1o. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Notif\u00edquese &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;El nombre de la menor involucrada en el presente asunto se oculta, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en orden a proteger su identidad e intimidad personal, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cumplimiento de lo previsto en el art\u00edculo 33 de la Ley 1098 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de 2006 (C\u00f3digo de la Infancia y la Adolescencia, \u00abLos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ni\u00f1os, las ni\u00f1as y los adolescentes tienen derecho a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la intimidad personal, mediante la protecci\u00f3n contra toda &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;injerencia arbitraria o ilegal en su vida privada, la de su familia, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;domicilio y correspondencia. As\u00ed mismo, ser\u00e1n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;protegidos contra toda conducta, acci\u00f3n o circunstancia que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;afecte su dignidad\u00bb). &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Carmen Julia Cabello Matamala, Reconocimiento &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Ejecuci\u00f3n de Sentencias Extranjeras en Materia Familia, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Lima, 2000, p. 805. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Numeral &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;3, art\u00edculo 606 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AC238-2021 (2020-02892-00) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2020-02892-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; AC238-2021 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2020-02892-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-febrero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53320"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53320\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}