{"id":53770,"date":"2024-05-17T20:41:44","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T20:41:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/17\/ac640-2021-2021-00320-00\/"},"modified":"2024-05-17T20:41:44","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T20:41:44","slug":"ac640-2021-2021-00320-00","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/17\/ac640-2021-2021-00320-00\/","title":{"rendered":"AC 640 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AC640-2021 (2021-00320-00)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2021-00320-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AC640-2021 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2021-00320-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bogot\u00e1, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;D.C., primero (1\u00b0) de marzo de dos mil veintiuno (2021). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Dec\u00eddese &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sobre la admisi\u00f3n de la solicitud de exequatur presentada por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Gustavo Enrique Ruiz Parrado, respecto a la sentencia n.\u00ba &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;401\/2017 dictada el 26 de julio de 2017 por el Juzgado de Primera &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Instancia n.\u00b0 7 de Castell\u00f3n, Reino de Espa\u00f1a, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;dentro del proceso divorcio por mutuo acuerdo promovido por el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;solicitante y Carolina Ardila Lenis. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONSIDERACIONES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;El exequatur &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;es un procedimiento jurisdiccional que tiene por finalidad otorgar a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;una sentencia proferida en el exterior los mismos efectos que una &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;local1, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en virtud de los principios de colaboraci\u00f3n arm\u00f3nica &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;entre los estados y reciprocidad diplom\u00e1tica. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En Colombia, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tales requerimientos est\u00e1n consagrados en el art\u00edculo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;606 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, uno de los cuales es que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la providencia extranjera \u00abse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;encuentre ejecutoriada de conformidad con la ley del pa\u00eds de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;origen\u00bb, esto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;es, que tenga car\u00e1cter definitivo y haya hecho tr\u00e1nsito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a cosa juzgada. Para su acreditaci\u00f3n, el actor tiene la carga &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procesal de acercar las pruebas que den cuenta de esta situaci\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;so pena que la actuaci\u00f3n sea repelida in &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;limine. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>La Corte se ha &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;referido al punto en los siguientes t\u00e9rminos: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>No &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;obstante, contrastadas las piezas documentales aportadas con las &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;premisas legales que se indicaron, se advierte que la reclamante no &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;aport\u00f3\u2026 la constancia de que se encuentra ejecutoriada &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de conformidad con la ley del pa\u00eds de origen\u2026 Por las &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;razones precedentes, y ante la falta de cumplimiento de la carga &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procesal a que estaba obligada la promotora del tr\u00e1mite, se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;impone el rechazo de la demanda, tal como lo ordena el art\u00edculo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;607 del C\u00f3digo General del Proceso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(CSJ AC1956, 7 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ab. 2016, rad. n.\u00b0 2016-00644-00. En el mismo sentido AC, 25 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ene. 2016, rad. n.\u00b0 2016-00067-00; y AC, 20 feb. 2015, rad. n.\u00b0 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2015-00254-00). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Trat\u00e1ndose &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de fallos provenientes de Espa\u00f1a, se tiene que entre este &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pa\u00eds y Colombia se suscribi\u00f3 el Convenio 134 de 30 de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;mayo de 1908, Sobre Ejecuci\u00f3n de Sentencias Civiles, el cual &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;dispuso que la ejecutoria \u00abse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;comprobar\u00e1 por un certificado expedido por el Ministro de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Gobierno o de Gracia y Justicia\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(art\u00edculo 2), hoy Subdirecci\u00f3n General Adjunta de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Cooperaci\u00f3n Jur\u00eddica Internacional y Relaciones con &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;las Confesiones del Ministerio de Justicia. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Se trata de un &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;caso de tarifa legal que no admite otros medios demostrativos, por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;lo que su ausencia deber\u00e1 conducir al rechazo de la petici\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;como lo ha reconocido esta Corte en m\u00faltiples decisiones2. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Aplicadas las &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;anteriores consideraciones al presente caso se tiene que deber\u00e1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;rechazarse la demanda presentada, en tanto no se arrim\u00f3 la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;prueba id\u00f3nea para demostrar que la sentencia n.\u00b0 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;401\/2017 de 26 de julio de 2017, proferida por el Juzgado de Primera &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Instancia n.\u00b0 7 de Castell\u00f3n, Reino de Espa\u00f1a, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;est\u00e1 ejecutoriada, de suerte que lo decidido en ella tenga &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;car\u00e1cter inmutable e intangible. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En efecto, el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;promotor olvid\u00f3 anexar, al libelo introductorio, la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;certificaci\u00f3n del Ministerio de Justicia de Espa\u00f1a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sobre el car\u00e1cter definitivo del prove\u00eddo a homologar, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por lo que se falt\u00f3 a esta carga probatoria. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Por consiguiente, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en aplicaci\u00f3n del numeral 2 del art\u00edculo 607 del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, deber\u00e1 rechazarse la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;demanda, al no observarse el requisito consagrado en el numeral 3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del art\u00edculo 606 \u00eddem. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>DECISI\u00d3N &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En m\u00e9rito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de lo expuesto, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, resuelve: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Primero. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Rechazar de plano la solicitud de exequatur presentada por Gustavo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Enrique Ruiz Parrado en el proceso de la radicaci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Segundo. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Secretar\u00eda dese cumplimiento al art\u00edculo 90 del C\u00f3digo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;General del Proceso, en el sentido de devolver los anexos de la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;demanda sin necesidad de desglose. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Tercero. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Reconocer personer\u00eda jur\u00eddica a Stefany G\u00f3mez &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Penagos como apoderada judicial del solicitante, en los t\u00e9rminos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del poder que obra a folios 1 a 6 del archivo anexos del expediente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;digital. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Notif\u00edquese. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Carmen Julia Cabello Matamala, Reconocimiento &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Ejecuci\u00f3n de Sentencias Extranjeras en Materia Familia, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Lima, 2000, p. 805. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AC744, 16 feb. 2016, rad. n.\u00b0 2015-02905-00; AC567, 9 feb. 2016, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;rad. n.\u00b0 2015-02242-00; AC3857, 8 jul. 2015, rad. n.\u00b0 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;2015-02242-00; AC6498, 27 sept. 2016, rad. n.\u00b0 2016-02648-00; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;entre otros. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AC640-2021 (2021-00320-00) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 11001-02-03-000-2021-00320-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53770","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-marzo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53770","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53770"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53770\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53770"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53770"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53770"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}