{"id":65977,"date":"2024-05-20T20:57:12","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T20:57:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/stc10267-2022\/"},"modified":"2024-05-20T20:57:12","modified_gmt":"2024-05-20T20:57:12","slug":"stc10267-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/stc10267-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"STC10267 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>STC10267-2022<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2022-02615-00 &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>OCTAVIO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AUGUSTO TEJEIRO DUQUE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>STC10267-2022 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2022-02615-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(Aprobado en Sala de diez de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;agosto de dos mil veintid\u00f3s) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bogot\u00e1, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;D.C., diez (10) de agosto de dos mil veintid\u00f3s (2022). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;resuelve la tutela que el Fondo de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Empleados y Extrabajadores de Ecopetrol de Participaci\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Utilidades -FONCOECO- le interpuso a la Sala Civil del Tribunal &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogot\u00e1 y al Juzgado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Cuarenta y Dos Civil Circuito de esa ciudad, extensiva a los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;intervinientes en el proceso n\u00b0 2019-00039-00. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>ANTECEDENTES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;La entidad accionante pidi\u00f3 que se revoque la sentencia por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;medio de la cual el juzgado neg\u00f3 la demanda que le promovi\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a Ecopetrol S.A. (3 feb. 2022), as\u00ed como la del Tribunal que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la confirm\u00f3 (30 jun. 2022) y, en su lugar, se acceda a sus &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pretensiones. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Adujo, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;esencia, que mediante la acci\u00f3n incoada aspira a que su &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;contradictora rinda cuentas de los dineros que le pertenecen a sus &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;afiliados en virtud del derecho que, a su juicio, los mismos tienen &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sobre parte de las utilidades de la empresa. Sin embargo, a pesar de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que sus aspiraciones est\u00e1n debidamente soportadas, las &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;autoridades judiciales se reh\u00fasan a acogerlas. Precis\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tambi\u00e9n que, aunque interpuso casaci\u00f3n frente a la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;providencia de segundo grado, la protecci\u00f3n debe concederse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de manera transitoria, pues la asociaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;\u00abamenaza con desaparecer\u00bb ante &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la muerte y el retiro de sus asociados, quien est\u00e1n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;frustrados ante la negativa de la empresa a hacerlos part\u00edcipes &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de sus utilidades. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Los convocados se opusieron. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONSIDERACIONES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>El &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ruego debe fracasar porque, como lo sabe el propio accionante, no se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ha definido el remedio extraordinario promovido por el censor para &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;alcanzar lo anhelado a trav\u00e9s de este sendero1, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y como lo ha expuesto la Sala, a este mecanismo no puede acudirse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;para reclamar prematuramente un pronunciamiento del juez &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;constitucional, \u00abal &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;no haber sido instituido para alternar con las herramientas de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;defensa judicial que el ordenamiento jur\u00eddico ha contemplado, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sino cuando carezca de \u00e9stas\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(CSJ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;STC9137-2022). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Tampoco &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procede el resguardo como mecanismo transitorio, pues los argumentos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ofrecidos por el tutelante no revelan la existencia de un da\u00f1o &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;grave, inminente e irresistible que haga impostergable la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;intromisi\u00f3n supralegal (CSJ STC9358-2022). Baste destacar, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que el Fondo alude a la \u00abamenaza &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de desaparecer\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en virtud del tiempo que pueda tomar la resoluci\u00f3n de esa &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;impugnaci\u00f3n, sin describir cu\u00e1les son las garant\u00edas &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;fundamentales que se ver\u00edan lesionadas ante la espera, ni &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tampoco la conexidad entre ese hecho y la rendici\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cuentas reclamada. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Entonces, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;como el ruego es prematuro, y no se acredit\u00f3 la existencia de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;un perjuicio irremediable, el ruego se declarar\u00e1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;improcedente. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>DECISI\u00d3N &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;m\u00e9rito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de lo expuesto, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en Sala de Casaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Civil, administrando justicia en nombre de la Rep\u00fablica y por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;autoridad de la Constituci\u00f3n y la Ley DECLARA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;IMPROCEDENTE la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tutela &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;instada por el Fondo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Empleados y Extrabajadores de Ecopetrol de Participaci\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Utilidades -FONCOECO- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Inf\u00f3rmese &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a las partes e intervinientes por el medio m\u00e1s expedito y, de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;no impugnarse, rem\u00edtase el expediente a la Corte &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Constitucional para su eventual revisi\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>NOTIF\u00cdQUESE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Y C\u00daMPLASE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>HILDA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;GONZ\u00c1LEZ NEIRA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Presidenta &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Sala &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>MARTHA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;PATRICIA GUZM\u00c1N \u00c1LVAREZ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LUIS ALONSO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;RICO PUERTA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>OCTAVIO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AUGUSTO TEJEIRO DUQUE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1\u0002 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;No &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;fue sino hasta el pasado 1\u00b0 de agosto que el Tribunal de Bogot\u00e1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;concedi\u00f3 la casaci\u00f3n y orden\u00f3 remitir el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;expediente a esta Corporaci\u00f3n para que se zanjara lo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pertinente (Consulta de procesos). &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>STC10267-2022 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2022-02615-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; OCTAVIO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AUGUSTO TEJEIRO DUQUE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; STC10267-2022 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2022-02615-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[52],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65977","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-agosto-2022"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65977","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65977"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65977\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65977"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65977"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65977"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}