{"id":71077,"date":"2024-05-20T22:42:18","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T22:42:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/stc861-2023\/"},"modified":"2024-05-20T22:42:18","modified_gmt":"2024-05-20T22:42:18","slug":"stc861-2023","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/stc861-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"STC861 2023"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>STC861-2023<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2023-00342-00 &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>OCTAVIO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AUGUSTO TEJEIRO DUQUE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>STC861-2023 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2023-00342-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(Aprobado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en sesi\u00f3n del ocho de febrero de dos mil veintitr\u00e9s) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bogot\u00e1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;D.C., ocho (08) de febrero de dos mil veintitr\u00e9s (2023). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;resuelve la acci\u00f3n de tutela que Hember &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ba\u00f1os Morales interpuso en nombre de Nauris Ruiz Mercado, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;frente a la Sala Civil-Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Judicial de Cartagena y el Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito de esa &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ciudad, extensiva a los intervinientes en el proceso 2018-00453-00. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>ANTECEDENTES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1.- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;El libelista, obrando como \u00abapoderado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de la parte demandante se\u00f1or Nauris Ruiz Mercado\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pidi\u00f3 revocar i) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sentencia emitida por el juzgado el 30 de julio de 2019, en el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;\u00abejecutivo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;hipotecario\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;donde funge como demandado, ii) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el interlocutorio de 25 de enero de 2022, por medio del cual la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;misma autoridad rechaz\u00f3 el incidente de nulidad que propuso, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y iii) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la providencia de 19 de enero de 2023 del Tribunal, que ratific\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la anterior directriz. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Para respaldar &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;las pretensiones, adujo, en esencia, que la agencia civil del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;circuito vulner\u00f3 el debido proceso y defensa del ejecutado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Nauris &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ruiz Mercado, ya que adelant\u00f3 la audiencia en la que desat\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la controversia (30 jul. 2019), pese a que aquel carec\u00eda de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;defensa t\u00e9cnica, tras la renuncia presentada por su apoderado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el 26 de julio de 2019. Adem\u00e1s, precis\u00f3 que \u00abmuy &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a pesar de que con la contestaci\u00f3n de la demanda y la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;proposici\u00f3n de excepciones el demandado acredit\u00f3 pago &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;parcial\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el despacho \u00abno &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;hizo reconocimiento alguno\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sumado a que no valor\u00f3 \u00abcon &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la sana cr\u00edtica judicial\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;su interrogatorio de parte. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Finalmente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;advirti\u00f3 que \u00abya &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se hab\u00eda presentado una acci\u00f3n constitucional (\u2026) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;frente a la decisi\u00f3n del Juzgado Primero Civil del Circuito &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Cartagena (\u2026)\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(STC12862-2019), pero fue desestimada porque para ese momento no &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;hab\u00eda provocado un pronunciamiento del fallador. Entonces, a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tono con la anterior indicaci\u00f3n, formul\u00f3 incidente de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;nulidad, pero sin \u00e9xito, ya que el juzgador accionado lo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;rechaz\u00f3 y la Corporaci\u00f3n de Cartagena respald\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;esa determinaci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.- &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Los convocados se opusieron al amparo y remitieron el enlace &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;contentivo del expediente examinado. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONSIDERACIONES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>De &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la evidencia allegada a este tr\u00e1mite, muy pronto se advierte &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el fracaso del ruego, comoquiera que Hember &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ba\u00f1os Morales &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;acudi\u00f3 a este sendero en nombre de Nauris &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ruiz Mercado, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sin estar facultado para ello. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tal sentido, cabe resaltar que los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;art\u00edculos 10 y 31 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 establecen como &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;presupuesto para el ejercicio de este remedio excepcional la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;existencia de \u00abun &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;inter\u00e9s que legitime [la] intervenci\u00f3n\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;precursor, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que en punto de eventuales violaciones de los atributos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;fundamentales propiciadas por el obrar jurisdiccional debe &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;predicarse, en estricto rigor, de quienes integran alguno de los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;extremos del litigio o de los terceros directamente afectados, no de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;abogados que los representan. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Y si &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se trata de representar en este tr\u00e1mite especial a los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;titulares de la relaci\u00f3n debatida, el suscriptor del libelo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;deber\u00e1 allegar un poder que lo habilite a ese fin, sin que el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;otorgado en las diligencias confrontadas resulte \u00fatil, ya &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que, como lo ha reiterado la Sala, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cuando la acci\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tutela se ejerce a t\u00edtulo de otro, es necesario contar con &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;poder especial para (\u2026) su interposici\u00f3n. La carencia &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de la citada personer\u00eda para iniciar la acci\u00f3n de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;amparo constitucional, no se suple con la presentaci\u00f3n del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;apoderamiento otorgado para un asunto diferente. (\u2026) La falta &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de poder especial para adelantar el proceso de tutela por parte de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;un apoderado judicial, aun &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;cuando tenga poder espec\u00edfico o general en otros asuntos, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;no lo habilita para ejercer la acci\u00f3n de amparo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;constitucional a nombre de su mandante y, por lo tanto, en estos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;casos, la tutela debe ser declarada improcedente (\u2026) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(CSJ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;STC5308-2021, STC11564-2022, entre otras). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;este orden de ideas, el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;\u00fanico &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;habilitado para promover esta ayuda en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procura de repeler las fallas que se denuncian con ocasi\u00f3n lo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;zanjado en el coercitivo 2018-00453-00 ser\u00eda su poderdante, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;quien no la facult\u00f3 legalmente para interceder por \u00e9l &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ante el juez constitucional o por lo menos tal potestad no obra &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;prueba en el infolio. N\u00f3tese que el suscriptor del libelo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;solo remiti\u00f3 el escrito de tutela, sin anunciar o aportar el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;respectivo mandato. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Son &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;estos breves argumentos los que conducen a la desestimaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de la salvaguarda. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>DECISI\u00d3N &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>En &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;m\u00e9rito de lo expuesto, la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en Sala &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Casaci\u00f3n Civil, administrando justicia en nombre de la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Rep\u00fablica y por autoridad de la Constituci\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;DECLARA IMPROCEDENTE la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tutela planteada por Hember &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Ba\u00f1os Morales. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Inf\u00f3rmese &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a los participantes por el medio m\u00e1s expedito y rem\u00edtase &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el paginario a la Corte Constitucional para su eventual revisi\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de no impugnarse esta resoluci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>NOTIF\u00cdQUESE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Y C\u00daMPLASE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>MARTHA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;PATRICIA GUZM\u00c1N \u00c1LVAREZ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Presidenta &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de Sala &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>HILDA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;GONZ\u00c1LEZ NEIRA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;QUIROZ MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>LUIS ALONSO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;RICO PUERTA &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>FRANCISCO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;TERNERA BARRIOS &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>STC861-2023 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2023-00342-00 &nbsp; &nbsp; OCTAVIO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;AUGUSTO TEJEIRO DUQUE &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Magistrado &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ponente &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; STC861-2023 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n\u00ba 11001-02-03-000-2023-00342-00 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71077","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-febrero-2023"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71077","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71077"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71077\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71077"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71077"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71077"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}