{"id":73729,"date":"2024-05-20T22:42:42","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T22:42:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/ac1609-2023-2007-00014-01\/"},"modified":"2024-05-20T22:42:42","modified_gmt":"2024-05-20T22:42:42","slug":"ac1609-2023-2007-00014-01","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/2024\/05\/20\/ac1609-2023-2007-00014-01\/","title":{"rendered":"AC 1609 2023"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AC1609-2023 (2007-00014-01)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 68001-31-03-004-2007-00014-01 &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AC1609-2023 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 68001-31-03-004-2007-00014-01 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bogot\u00e1 D.C., nueve (9) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de junio de dos mil veintitr\u00e9s (2023). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Se toman decisiones respecto a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;las solicitudes presentadas por V\u00edctor Rafael Rodr\u00edguez &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;C\u00e1ceres, con posterioridad al auto del 30 de mayo de 2023, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el cual se resolvi\u00f3 la queja interpuesta contra el prove\u00eddo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del 19 de enero de 2021, por el cual se deneg\u00f3 la concesi\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del recurso de casaci\u00f3n formulado frente a la sentencia del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;11 de diciembre de 2020. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>ANTECEDENTES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Una vez denegada la concesi\u00f3n de la casaci\u00f3n contra la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sentencia de segunda instancia por parte del ad &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;quem, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el demandante censur\u00f3 esta determinaci\u00f3n por medio de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;los recursos de reposici\u00f3n y, subsidiariamente, s\u00faplica, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por cuanto el proceso es \u00abdeclarativo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de naturaleza[, sobre] un inmueble de inter\u00e9s social sujeto a &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[la] norma internacional del Protocolo de San Salvador\u2026 [por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;lo] que no requiere de cuant\u00eda\u00bb. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. Rehusada &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la reposici\u00f3n y agotado el tr\u00e1mite de la queja, en &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;aplicaci\u00f3n del par\u00e1grafo del art\u00edculo 318 del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;C\u00f3digo General del Proceso, esta Corporaci\u00f3n por auto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del 30 de mayo del a\u00f1o en curso resolvi\u00f3 \u00abdeclarar &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;bien denegado el recurso de casaci\u00f3n interpuesto\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sin condena en costas y con la orden de devolver \u00abla &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;actuaci\u00f3n al despacho de origen\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(archivo digital 0014Auto.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Esta &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;decisi\u00f3n se notific\u00f3 por estado del 31 de mayo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;siguiente (archivo digital 0015Anexos.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3. El &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;opugnante, por memorial del 6 de junio, deprec\u00f3 \u00abaclaraci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del auto. (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[propuso] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;recurso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de reposici\u00f3n contra el auto que deniega el recurso de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;casci\u00f3n (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;donde &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se p\u00e1go (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;arancel judicial\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;con el argumento de que \u00abeste &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;proceso no requiere cuanti (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se r (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;prescriptivo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y adquuisitivo (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;dominio derechos inherentes al derecho prescriptivo\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(Archivo digital 0016Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>4. El mismo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;d\u00eda se formul\u00f3 \u00abrecurso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de resposci\u00f3n (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;auto ilegal e injusto que niega la casaci\u00f3n y [pidi\u00f3] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se me devuelva el pago del arancel judicial para el estudio serio y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;responsable de la alzada de marras\u2026 y recurso de reposci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;contra &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el auto que deniega el recurso de casci\u00f3n (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;donde &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se pag\u00f3 el arancel judicial\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por cuanto \u00abeste &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;proceso no requiere de cuanti (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se r (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;prescriptivo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y adquuisitivo (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;dominio derechos inherentes al derecho prescriptivo\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(archivo digital 0017Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Minutos m\u00e1s &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tarde agreg\u00f3, en fundamento, que se desatendieron \u00ablos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;derechos humanos y [el] &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Protocolo &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de San Salvador\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(archivo digital 0018Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>5. La misma &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;persona solicit\u00f3, repetidamente, la reposici\u00f3n del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;auto que niega la casaci\u00f3n, la devoluci\u00f3n del arancel &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;judicial y la aclaraci\u00f3n del auto, por cuanto \u00abno &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;requiere de cuant\u00eda\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pues la \u00abdeclaraci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de pertenencia desde el a\u00f1o 2.007, m\u00e1s de veinte a\u00f1os &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de poseion (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en tr\u00e1mite que injusticia de este Palacio en Corte Suprema de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Justicia en violaci\u00f3n a los derecho (sic) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;humanos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y Protocolo de San Salvador\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(archivos digitales 0019Memorial.pdf y 0026Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>6. El &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;convocante alleg\u00f3, minutos m\u00e1s tarde, documento de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sustentaci\u00f3n del recurso de casaci\u00f3n, junto a unos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;anexos, sin ninguna explicaci\u00f3n o dilucidaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(archivos digitales 0021Memorial.pdf y 0025Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>7. Por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;\u00faltimo, se remiti\u00f3 copia de correo dirigido a la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;direcci\u00f3n \u00abcomision.acusaciones@camara.gov.co\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en la que se hacen afirmaciones sobre la calidad profesional del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;magistrado ponente que profiri\u00f3 el auto del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;30 de mayo de 2023 (archivo digital 0028Memorial.pdf). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CONSIDERACIONES &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1. Precisi\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;preliminar. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Dada la vaguedad de los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;pedimentos radicados, por referirse en abstracto al \u00abauto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que niega la casaci\u00f3n\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y \u00abal pago del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;arancel judicial\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sin precisar la autoridad o fecha en que se profiri\u00f3, se &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;interpretar\u00e1 en el sentido de que se est\u00e1 censurando, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tanto la providencia de esta Sala que resolvi\u00f3 la queja, como &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la emitida por el Tribunal en que no concedi\u00f3 la casaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y orden\u00f3 el pago de las reproducciones requeridas para &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tramitar el remedio vertical. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2. Solicitud de aclaraci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del auto del 30 de mayo de 2023. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Esta actuaci\u00f3n puede &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;adelantarse a petici\u00f3n de parte, siempre que sea \u00abformulada &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;dentro del t\u00e9rmino de ejecutoria de la providencia\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(ibidem). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ha dicho la Corte que, en los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;casos en que se desatienda este plazo, \u00abha &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de concluirse su extemporaneidad y, en consecuencia, su rechazo\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(AC2419, 18 jun. 2019, rad. 2019-01448-00; reiterado en AC1954, 16 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;may. 2022, rad. n.\u00b0 2018-03439-00, y AC2336, 7 jun. 2022, rad. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 2020-02862-00). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.2. La ejecutoria, trat\u00e1ndose &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de providencias \u00abproferidas &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por fuera de audiencia\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se alcanza \u00abtres &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(3) d\u00edas despu\u00e9s de notificadas, cuando carecen de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;recursos o han vencido los t\u00e9rminos sin haberse interpuesto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;los recursos que fueren procedentes, o cuando quede ejecutoriada la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;providencia que resuelva los interpuestos\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(art\u00edculo 302 del C.G.P.) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Norma interpretada en el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sentido de que \u00ab(a) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;si la providencia judicial no es susceptible de recursos, se tienen &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;tres (3) d\u00edas para solicitar su aclaraci\u00f3n o adici\u00f3n, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a cuyo vencimiento sin proposici\u00f3n se alcanza definitividad; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(b) trat\u00e1ndose de determinaciones recurribles, el plazo de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ejecutoria y, por ende, para deprecar la aclaraci\u00f3n o &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;adici\u00f3n, se confunde con el se\u00f1alado para promover los &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;recursos, salvo trat\u00e1ndose de la revisi\u00f3n que, por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;expreso mandato legal, s\u00f3lo procede frente a veredictos &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ejecutoriados (art\u00edculo 354 del C.G.P.); y (c) una vez &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;resueltos los remedios propuestos, la ejecutoria se lograr\u00e1 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;al tercer d\u00eda subsiguiente a la notificaci\u00f3n del auto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;o sentencia\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(AC134, 3 feb. 2023, rad. n.\u00b0 2022-03368-00). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>2.3. Aplicadas estas &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;consideraciones al sub &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;examine refulge la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;extemporaneidad de la aclaraci\u00f3n promovida, de all\u00ed &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que deba rechazarse de plano. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Para explicar basta recordar &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que, el auto del 30 de mayo del presente a\u00f1o, se notific\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por estado del d\u00eda siguiente, por lo que qued\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;ejecutoriado el 5 de junio, fecha l\u00edmite para promover su &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;clarificaci\u00f3n. Por ende, como el pedimento se radic\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en la data posterior, deviene intempestivo, lo que impide su estudio &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de fondo. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3. Solicitud de reposici\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del auto del 30 de mayo de 2023. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3.1. Seg\u00fan el canon 318 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del estatuto adjetivo en vigor, \u00ab[e]l &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;recurso de reposici\u00f3n no procede contra los autos que &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;resuelvan un recurso de apelaci\u00f3n, una s\u00faplica o una &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;queja\u00bb. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>La Corte, refiri\u00e9ndose &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;a este precepto, manifest\u00f3: \u00abse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;colige, que el referido medio de defensa no se puede interponer &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;contra decisiones de aquella estirpe\u2026 [luego] el medio de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;impugnaci\u00f3n planteado no se halla autorizado para decisiones &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;como la que en este asunto se ha pretendido controvertir [auto &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que resuelve una queja] y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en esa medida, de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el numeral 2\u00ba &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del canon 38, ib\u00eddem, su rechazo debe ser la consecuencia\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;(AC323, 31 en. 2018, rad. n.\u00b0 2017-01718-00). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3.2. Como en el presente caso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;se promovi\u00f3 reposici\u00f3n contra el auto que resolvi\u00f3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;la queja impulsada a tr\u00e1mite, emana su improcedencia, de all\u00ed &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;que deba rechazarse sin consideraciones adicionales. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>4. Reposici\u00f3n contra &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el auto que orden\u00f3 el pago de \u00abarancel &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;judicial\u00bb &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;y solicitud de devoluci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Como el remedio horizontal &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;debe ser resuelto por el funcionario que profiri\u00f3 la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;decisi\u00f3n, corresponder\u00e1 al sentenciador de segunda &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;instancia adoptar la decisi\u00f3n que corresponda frente a la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;reposici\u00f3n contra el numeral segundo del auto del 2 de julio &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de 2021, por el cual se orden\u00f3 al interesado \u00absufragar\u2026 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;el valor correspondiente a la digitalizaci\u00f3n del expediente\u00bb, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;una vez el expediente retorne a esta sede judicial. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>5. Escrito de demanda de &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;casaci\u00f3n. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Como por el referido auto del &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;30 de mayo del presente a\u00f1o qued\u00f3 zanjada la discusi\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;en torno a la inobservancia de los requisitos para acceder a la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;casaci\u00f3n, clausur\u00e1ndose de forma definitiva la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;procedencia de este mecanismo de defensa judicial en el caso &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;concreto, por sustracci\u00f3n de materia no puede emitirse &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;manifestaci\u00f3n alguna sobre el escrito que pretende &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;sustentarlo. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>6. Memorial dirigido a la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;direcci\u00f3n electr\u00f3nica &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;comision.acusaciones@camara.gov.co &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Incorp\u00f3rese al &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;expediente, \u00fanicamente para fines informativos. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>DECISI\u00d3N &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Con base en lo expuesto, el &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;magistrado ponente de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Civil, resuelve: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Primero. Rechazar la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;solicitud de aclaraci\u00f3n del auto del 30 de mayo de 2023. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Segundo. Rechazar la &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;reposici\u00f3n promovida contra el auto del 30 de mayo de 2023. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Tercero. Remitir al &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga, Sala Civil &#8211; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Familia, para lo de su competencia, la reposici\u00f3n formulada &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;contra el auto del 2 de julio de 2021. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Cuarto. No pronunciarse, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;por sustracci\u00f3n de materia, frente al escrito de sustentaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;del remedio casacional. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Quinto. Incorporar, &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;para fines informativos, el memorial dirigido a la direcci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;electr\u00f3nica comision.acusaciones@camara.gov.co &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Sexto. Por &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Secretar\u00eda dese cumplimiento al auto del 30 de mayo de 2023. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Notif\u00edquese y &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;c\u00famplase &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>AROLDO WILSON QUIROZ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;MONSALVO &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Magistrado &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>3 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>AC1609-2023 (2007-00014-01) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 68001-31-03-004-2007-00014-01 &nbsp; &nbsp; AC1609-2023 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Radicaci\u00f3n &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;n.\u00b0 68001-31-03-004-2007-00014-01 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Bogot\u00e1 D.C., nueve (9) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;de junio de dos mil veintitr\u00e9s (2023). &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-junio-2023"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73729"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73729\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}