\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Radicaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0n.\u00b0 18001-22-08-000-2015-00005-01 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
CORTE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
SALA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0DE CASACI\u00d3N CIVIL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
ARIEL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SALAZAR RAM\u00cdREZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Magistrado \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0ponente \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
ATC2999-2015 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Bogot\u00e1, \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0D. C., veintinueve (29) de mayo de dos mil quince (2015). \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
El \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0ciudadano Franquil Benavidez Moncayo actuando como agente oficioso \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de Maribel Salgado Mu\u00f1oz, dirige la acci\u00f3n de tutela \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de la referencia contra las decisiones adoptadas por el Juzgado \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Primero Laboral del Circuito de Florencia dentro \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de la ejecuci\u00f3n que aquella promovi\u00f3 contra el \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ministerio de Educaci\u00f3n Nacional. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
La \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0sentencia de primera instancia frente al amparo solicitado, fue \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0proferida por la Sala Primera del Tribunal Superior de ese Distrito \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Judicial. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Por \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0lo tanto, de acuerdo con los dictados del Decreto 1382 de 2000 y las \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0normas procesales que regulan la competencia, esta Sala no est\u00e1 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0facultada legalmente para resolver la impugnaci\u00f3n interpuesta \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0contra aquella determinaci\u00f3n. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
En \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0efecto, al tenor de lo normado por el numeral 2\u00ba del art\u00edculo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a01\u00ba del mencionado Decreto, \u201ccuando \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0acci\u00f3n de tutela se promueva contra un funcionario o \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0corporaci\u00f3n judicial, le ser\u00e1 repartida al respectivo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0superior funcional del accionado\u2026\u201d \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
A \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0su vez, el par\u00e1grafo de la referida disposici\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0se\u00f1ala: \u201cSi \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0conforme a los hechos descritos en la solicitud de tutela el juez no \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0es el competente, \u00e9ste deber\u00e1 enviarla al juez que lo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0sea a m\u00e1s tardar al d\u00eda siguiente de su recibo, previa \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0comunicaci\u00f3n a los interesados\u2026 En este caso, el \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0t\u00e9rmino para resolver la tutela se contar\u00e1 a partir \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0del momento en que sea recibida por el juez competente.\u201d \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Lo \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0anterior deja ver, sin lugar a dudas, que es a la Sala de Casaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Laboral \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0de esta Corporaci\u00f3n, a la que corresponde conocer la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0impugnaci\u00f3n planteada en esta queja constitucional, dado que \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0es el superior jer\u00e1rquico de la Sala Primera del Tribunal \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Superior del Distrito Judicial de Florencia, atendiendo la \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0naturaleza del asunto que origina el reclamo del tutelante. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
En \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0virtud de lo anterior, se dispone: \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
PRIMERO. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0REM\u00cdTASE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0el expediente de tutela a la Secretar\u00eda de la Sala de \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Casaci\u00f3n Laboral de esta Corporaci\u00f3n, para que se \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0verifique su reparto entre los Magistrados que la conforman. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
SEGUNDO. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0NOTIFICAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0esta decisi\u00f3n a la parte interesada por el medio m\u00e1s \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0expedito. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
C\u00famplase \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
ARIEL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SALAZAR RAM\u00cdREZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
Magistrado \u00a0<\/p>\n
2 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Radicaci\u00f3n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0n.\u00b0 18001-22-08-000-2015-00005-01 \u00a0 \u00a0 CORTE \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 SALA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0DE CASACI\u00d3N CIVIL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ARIEL \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0SALAZAR RAM\u00cdREZ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[96],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-96"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.dmsjuridica.com\/buscador_20179478954\/salacivil\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}